Electronic Discovery: Are We Competent?

JAMS
Contact

The State Bar of California has issued perhaps the country’s most straightforward and candid directive to litigators to learn the ins and outs of electronic discovery (e-discovery). In a proposed formal opinion, it states, “Not every litigated case ultimately involves e-discovery; however, in today’s technological world, almost every litigation matter potentially does.” It goes on to say that, as a matter of competency, the attorney handling e-discovery should be able to do the following nine things:

1. Assess e-discovery needs;

2. Implement appropriate preservation procedures;

3. Analyze and understand clients’ electronically stored information (ESI) systems and storage;

4. Identify custodians of relevant ESI;

5. Perform appropriate searches;

6. Collect responsive ESI in a manner that preserves its integrity;

7. Advise clients on available options for collection and preservation of ESI;

8. Engage in a “competent and meaningful” meet-and-confer to address e-discovery plan; and

9. Produce responsive ESI in an appropriate manner.

Originally published in Law.com on June 3, 2014.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

JAMS
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

JAMS on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide