English High Court Decision Further Curtails Application of Legal Privilege in Internal Investigations

Corporations should take steps to ensure their internal investigations are not used against them in English litigation.

A recent decision in an English court could have important consequences for internal corporate investigations. The decision in Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd [2017] EWHC 1017 contains a severely restrictive approach to the applicability of legal privilege to internal investigations unless conducted for the dominant purpose of defending against criminal prosecutions. This could be a real concern since prosecutions are a rarity in the context of white-collar corporate enforcement actions. Following the decision in the RBS Rights Issue Litigation, which likewise took a restrictive view of the applicability of legal privilege to internal investigations, this case indicates an important trend that may present significant issues in the conduct of investigations.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide