English High Court Decision Reinforces Application of Litigation Privilege in Internal Investigations

The decision indicates that company counsel should consider early how best to anticipate challenges to privilege claims over investigation materials.

Introduction -

A recent English High Court decision has important consequences for the application of legal professional privilege in internal corporate investigations. The decision, Bilta (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [2017] EWHC 3535 (Bilta), has reconfirmed that litigation privilege under English law can apply in “internal investigations by corporates in the face of scrutiny by government authorities.” As such, Bilta provides some contrast to last year’s decision in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd [2017] EWHC 1017 (ENRC). ENRC held that litigation privilege did not apply in an internal investigation conducted for the purpose of engaging in discussions with, and responding to, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide