With significant press coverage, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently announced that the state would limit the ability of certain non-U.S. persons, businesses, and governments from acquiring agricultural land in Florida. Florida is not alone in taking action to limit foreign acquisition of real estate within their borders. 

Alaska, Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Missouri, and Ohio all currently require foreign investors to disclose acquisitions of certain real estate, much like the U.S. Federal Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA). In fact, Illinois, Maine, and Wisconsin, allow acquirers to fulfill their reporting requirements by submitting a copy of applicable federal AFIDA reports.

Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Wisconsin limit foreign investment in real estate based on the number of acres, while Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Oklahoma ban foreign ownership of certain land completely.

Without the same fanfare, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) published a proposed rule on May 4, 2023, expanding CFIUS’s current regulations to cover eight additional government installations.

Expansion of Protected U.S. Real Estate

The Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) established CFIUS jurisdiction to real estate in proximity to specific airports, maritime ports, or military installations. The relevant installations are listed by name and location in an appendix to the CFIUS regulations. The May 4 rule proposes to add the following eight installations to the expanded geographic coverage list:

• Air Force Plant 42, located in Palmdale, California
• Dyess Air Force Base, located in Abilene, Texas
• Ellsworth Air Force Base, located in Box Elder, South Dakota
• Grand Forks Air Force Base, located in Grand Forks, North Dakota
• Iowa National Guard Joint Force Headquarters, located in Des Moines, Iowa
• Lackland Air Force Base, located in San Antonio, Texas
• Laughlin Air Force Base, located in Del Rio, Texas
• Luke Air Force Base, located in Glendale, Arizona

Expansion of CFIUS Beyond U.S. Defense Industrial Base

Historically, businesses involved in the U.S. defense industrial base have been protected from foreign direct investment by CFIUS. FIRRMA expanded those historic protections to include certain Critical Technologies, Critical Infrastructure, and Sensitive Data – collectively referred to as covered “TID.”

FIRRMA specifically expanded CFIUS to address national security concerns arising from foreign direct investment impacting critical infrastructure and sensitive government installations. Part 802 of FIRRMA established CFIUS jurisdiction and review for certain covered real estate, including real estate in proximity to specified airports, maritime ports, and military installations, and other critical infrastructure. 

Unlike covered Section 1758 technologies that can trigger a mandatory CFIUS filing, CFIUS jurisdiction for covered real estate currently remains only a voluntary filing. Regardless, the addition of the eight additional installations to the 100-mile “extended range” proximity coverage of Part 802 will result in substantially more covered real estate. As a result, early diligence remains critical to any transaction in the United States that may result in foreign ownership or control of real estate. 

Expansion of Protected Real Estate Elsewhere

In closing, it should be noted that the U.S. is not alone. The United Kingdom and the European Union both have legislative frameworks governing the investment in real estate. Many other industrialized countries, such as Australia, China and Japan, have similar regimes.

More specifically, the UK has taken steps to improve transparency around foreign ownership of UK property. The war in Ukraine and subsequent sanctions against Russia catapulted the issue to the top of the political agenda. As part of the UK Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022, the register of overseas entities went live on August 1, 2022. The register is maintained by Companies House and requires overseas entities which own land in the UK to disclose details of their beneficial owners. Failure to comply with the new legislation will impact any registration of ownership details at the UK Land Registry (and thus the relevant legal and equitable ownership rights in any relevant property) and officers of any entity in breach will also be liable to criminal proceedings.

Recommendations

Whether a buyer or a seller, all real estate transactions should include an analysis of the citizenship of the interested parties, the nature of the land, the applicability of U.S., UK or laws that can impact the parties, timing, or transaction. Additional information on the proposed CFIUS rule is in the Federal Register notice, and additional general information on U.S. CFIUS / FIRRMA located from the Treasury’s website. 

This article is part of Womble Bond Dickinson’s Growing Global series. 

[View source.]