False Claims Act Update: GSA Contractor Reasonably Relied Upon Distributor Certifications Of Product Origin And Trade Agreements Act Compliance

King & Spalding
Contact

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently upheld a District Court’s dismissal of a False Claims Act (FCA) complaint against a federal government contractor in a case that will be of interest to companies in a variety of industries, including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and construction. The Court upheld the dismissal – which occurred at Summary Judgment – when the Relator was unable to point to any evidence contradicting the contractor’s evidence that it reasonably had relied upon supplier certifications that the products sold to the government complied with the origin requirements of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (TAA), 19 U.S.C.§§ 2501-2581.

In short, as a result of this ruling, businesses that sell their products to the federal government may more reasonably rely on suppliers’ certifications of TAA compliance, and issuers of such certifications may come under greater scrutiny.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© King & Spalding

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide