Federal Circuit Appeals Continue as Scheduled Without In-Person Arguments

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints
Contact

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released modifications to court procedures, indicating that all in-person oral arguments are suspended until further notice. Fed. Cir. Admin. Order No. 20-02 (May 18, 2020). While access to the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building has been restricted to “(a) counsel and parties with a scheduled in-person hearing and (b) members of the press who present media credentials” since March 16, 2020 (see Fed. Cir. Operating Status No. 20-03 (Mar. 16, 2020)), the Federal Circuit up to this point had been issuing public advisories on a month-by-month basis notifying parties that all oral arguments will be held telephonically. See Fed. Cir. Updated Pub. Advisory Concerning the Fed. Cir.’s April 2020 Sitting (Mar. 18, 2020); Fed. Cir. Pub. Advisory Concerning the May 2020 Court Session (Apr. 21, 2020); Fed. Cir. Pub. Advisory Concerning the June 2020 Court Session (May 11, 2020).

In issuing its modification order yesterday, the Court identified its national jurisdiction, the varying approaches and timeframes for communities reopening and the impact on travel due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. Chief Judge Prost also clarified that all case scheduling will continue in accordance with existing procedures and that the Court may also choose to dispense with oral arguments where they are determined to be unnecessary pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2)(C). Even though the timing as to when in-person arguments will resume at the Court remains unknown, yesterday’s order in a way provides greater predictability to counsel appearing before the court that in the near term their argument, if any, will be telephonic.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Written by:

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide