Federal Oversight of Schools Is Changing, But Not Gone

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact

Fox Rothschild LLP

What educators need to know about President Trump’s DOE executive order and its effect on OCR enforcement priorities

The long-rumored plan to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) took a formal step forward on March 20, 2025, when President Trump signed an Executive Order calling for the agency’s closure.

While headlines suggest a sweeping shake-up, the legal and practical reality is more nuanced.

Educators are navigating a fast-changing legal environment with real implications for funding, compliance and student services. While the DOE’s future is uncertain, civil rights enforcement isn’t going away — it’s being reshaped. The best defense remains clarity, consistency and inclusive practices rooted in existing law.

Yes, federal oversight is changing. No, it hasn’t disappeared.

What’s in the Executive Order?

The Executive Order (EO) directs the Secretary of Education to begin “facilitating the closure” of the department and returning educational authority to states and local communities. But for now, the DOE continues to operate — albeit under sharp political scrutiny and ongoing legal challenges.

The order does not immediately eliminate federal education funding or programming. It does, however, signal several priorities that will shape enforcement and compliance in the months ahead:

  • A crackdown on DEI programs, which the order refers to as “illegal discrimination.”
  • A commitment to returning control — and accountability — to the states.
  • Opposition to gender identity protections, particularly for transgender student-athletes and access to facilities.

Didn’t We Just Get New DOE Guidance on Race and DEI?

Yes. Just a few weeks before the Executive Order, the DOE’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a Dear Colleague Letter (Feb. 14, 2025) and an accompanying FAQ document (March 1, 2025) outlining how it would enforce Title VI of the Civil Rights Act in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.

In that decision, the high court struck down race-conscious college admissions and clarified that any race-based decision-making — including in K–12 education — must survive strict legal scrutiny.

The OCR’s guidance emphasized that:

  • DEI programs must be inclusive and non-discriminatory.
  • Race can’t be used — even indirectly — as a factor in distributing benefits.
  • Schools must avoid “proxies” for race in admissions, aid, hiring or programming.

In addition, the DOE launched an "End DEI" portal that invites public complaints regarding alleged violations.

At the same time, OCR reaffirmed that celebrating cultural or historical events (e.g., Black History Month) is permissible, so long as participation is open to all students.

So, Is the DOE Still Enforcing Anything?

The short answer is: Yes, just differently.

Enforcement is becoming more targeted, with a focus on:

  • Transgender participation in athletics and access to facilities
  • DEI programs perceived to “exclude” or “burden” students based on race
  • Claims of discrimination against White and Asian students
  • School policies seen as inconsistent with the administration’s interpretation of civil rights laws

Behind the scenes, DOE staff cuts and office closures have slowed or paused certain investigations. But OCR remains active — especially where complaints align with the administration’s stated priorities.

Practical Guidance for Schools and Educators

Amid this legal and political flux, educators still face day-to-day questions. Here’s what schools can do now:

  • Audit your DEI and equity-related programming
    Ensure participation is open to all students and that programming does not treat students differently based on race or gender identity.
  • Review admissions, hiring and aid policies
    Avoid using race, gender identity or any related proxies as decision-making factors — directly or indirectly.
  • Prepare for scrutiny
    OCR’s complaint portal is active, and enforcement may come from a narrowed but focused OCR, with support from DOJ. Be prepared to explain how policies align with Title VI and current guidance.
  • Don’t panic about the DOE closure just yet
    Many functions (e.g., federal aid, IDEA funding) are governed by congressional statute. While the administration has signaled major changes, most should require legislative action or face legal challenges.
  • Keep an eye on litigation
    Numerous lawsuits have already been filed challenging aspects of the Executive Order and prior guidance. This legal landscape will continue to shift.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Fox Rothschild LLP

Written by:

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Fox Rothschild LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide