Financial Litigation Insights - Summer 2013 Vol. 5 No. 2

Robins Kaplan LLP
Contact

In This Issue:

- Learning to Stand Again: Revisiting RMBS Class Claims in Light of NECA-IBEW

- Structural Complexity as a Cover for Fraud? Analyzing Losses from Exotic Structured Investment Products

- Meet Our In-House Economic Consultants

- Excerpt from Learning to Stand Again: Revisiting RMBS Class Claims in Light of NECA-IBEW:

The Fall 2010 issue of Financial Litigation Insights addressed a trend by federal courts in limiting investors from representing others in cases for fraud in the residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) market. Specifically, certain courts precluded class plaintiffs from suing for those who purchased securities derived from the same shelf statement but who did not purchase the same security. Other courts limited classes to investors in the same trust (regardless of tranche level). But those limitations, at least for some, were lifted by the Second Circuit in NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. Goldman Sachs & Co., so it may be time to rethink class membership.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robins Kaplan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Robins Kaplan LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Robins Kaplan LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide