FTC Ban on Worker Non-Compete Agreements Enjoined by U.S. District Court Judge

Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP
Contact

Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP

On July 3, 2024, a United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas granted a stay and preliminary injunction on the United States Federal Trade Commission’s near-total ban on noncompete agreements. See Ryan v. Federal Trade Commission, Case No. 3:24-cv-00986, (N.D. Tex. July 3, 2024) (order granting preliminary injunction).

In the case, the Plaintiff, Ryan, LLC, and Plaintiff-Intervenors, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce sought an order staying the effective date of the Non-Compete Rule and preliminarily enjoining the FTC from enforcing the Rule. In its decision, the court granted a stay and issued a preliminary injunction, finding that (1) the Plaintiff and Plaintiff-Intervenors are likely to succeed on the merits; (2) irreparable harm will result without the issuance of injunctive relief; and (3) the balance of harms and public interest weigh in favor of granting injunctive relief. The court agreed with the Plaintiffs’ reasoning that the FTC lacks authority to create substantive rules defining unfair methods of competition. In addition, the court relied on the Plaintiff and Plaintiff-Intervenors’ assertion that millions of workers and employers will be affected immediately, as they will lose bargained-for contractual protections, which would force employers to expend significant time and funds to offset the effects of the ban.

Despite the request for nationwide injunctive relief, the court limited the scope of its order to the named Plaintiff, Ryan, LLC, and Plaintiff-Intervenors, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce. As a result, the FTC’s rule is still set to take effect September 4, 2024, for all other employers. Employers may still see a reprieve if a different result is reached in a case pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania raising similar issues about the FTC’s rule or if the Ryan court rules on the merits of the lawsuit by late August, which the court represented in its decision that it will do.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP

Written by:

Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide