FTC Sues Debt Collector Over Alleged Deceptive Practices

Goodwin
Contact

Goodwin

​On November 4, 2024, the FTC​ an​nounced ​that it had filed suit against a ​Georgia-based debt collector​ for engaging in allegedly deceptive and abusive​ debt collection practices, in violation of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, and its associated Regulation F, 12 C.F.R. Part 1006, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 6821. ​

According to the FTC’s complaint​ filed in the Northern District of Georgia​, the company allegedly ​engaged in a scheme to improperly collect debts that consumers did not owe, or that the company did not have the authority to collect.​ The FTC alleges that the company repeatedly called consumers or their family members​​ regarding a purported “​legal matter”, and routinely did not disclose its status as a debt collector. The FTC further alleges that in many instances, the company falsely represented itself as a mediation company to consumers, or represented that it possessed certain ​priva​te information about consumers in order to convince consumers of the legitimacy of the debt collection. The FTC alleges that​ the company then falsely threatened consumers with legal action or arrest if the purported debt was not paid.​​ The FTC asserts that in many of these instances, the consumers did not owe the debt or the company was not authorized to collect it. ​The FTC contends that the company has collected over $4.5 million from consumers ​since 2021 through the alleged scheme.​​

On the same day that the suit was filed, a Georgia Northern District Court judge granted ​the FTC’s request for a temporary restraining order, enjoining the company from misrepresenting the status of any debt or its authority to collect to any consumer​​​, threatening to take any unlawful action​, or ​using any false or deceptive means to collect a debt or obtain personal consumer information, ​​and freezing all of the company’s assets.​ The Court’s temporary order will expire after fourteen days. The FTC seeks a permanent injunction restraining the company from future violations of consumer finance law, as well as unspecified monetary relief.​​​​

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Goodwin

Written by:

Goodwin
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Goodwin on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide