Gas Lines to Pipelines: The Case for Comprehensive Federal Energy Legislation

Mintz
Contact

We’ve struggled with the consequences of an insufficient federal energy policy for nearly half a century. From the gas lines of the 1970s to the Keystone XL pipeline controversy of the past several years, the federal and state governments have engaged in a fractured and inefficient approach to the regulation of the energy industry allowing states, municipalities, and even individual citizens to delay and even defeat major projects that would decrease energy costs, increase our energy security, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.

The absence of a cohesive and comprehensive energy policy has left us with regulatory uncertainty stifling innovation that would drive economic growth, high energy prices creating a drag on that same economy, and hollow promises to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without a sustainable plan to achieve those reductions.

Originally published in American Bar Association's Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources on March 24, 2015.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mintz | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Mintz
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Mintz on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide