“If You Were Justin Bieber’s Lawyer, What Would You Be Doing Today?”

Greenberg Glusker LLP
Contact

Greenberg Glusker partner Bonnie Eskenazi was quoted in the American Lawyer Litigation Daily article, “If You Were Justin Bieber’s Lawyer, What Would You Be Doing Today?” on October 12, 2015 (subscription required).

The article focuses on the unique aspects of representing of celebrities, with Eskenazi noting, “Movie stars, musicians and other entertainers for the most part are ‘just people with the same feelings and concerns’ as regular mortals.”  However, when it comes to stars’ legal worries, Eskenazi says they tend to be a bit different.

Whether the litigation involves breach of contract or invasion of privacy, Eskenazi says the overriding question when representing a celebrity client should be, “How do you protect a person’s talent?”  She says this is “different than protecting a widget or a golf course.”

Eskenazi doesn’t comment on specific cases. However, there are an abundance of celebrity legal matters in the public sphere one can point to such as the current litigation involving Justin Beiber pending in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. 

When asked, “If you were, say, Justin Bieber’s lawyer, what would be on your plate right now?”,  Eskenazi commented, “The most common celebrity litigation involves delineation of rights, and this suit against Bieber, his mentor Usher and multiple music publishers falls into that category.”

Deciding whether to settle or litigate can also be challenging in the entertainment field since celebrities have different concerns. Eskenazi notes, “If you’re representing someone like Shell Oil or BP, they make a business decision more on dollars and cents,” she said. With talent, the litigation may turn more on concerns about public perception. “It’s not the same decision-making matrix,” she said.

“I teach entertainment law at Stanford Law School, and I ask my students ‘What is entertainment law?’ There is no such thing,” she said. Rather, it’s a combination of multiple practice areas “overlaid on to the most unique, strange industry. ... You can’t understand the legal side without understanding the business side.”

- See more at: http://www.greenbergglusker.com/news/mediamentions/-if-you-were-justin-bieber-s-lawyer-what-would-you-be-doing-today-#sthash.cVB1YG3B.dpuf

Greenberg Glusker partner Bonnie Eskenazi was quoted in the American Lawyer Litigation Daily article, “If You Were Justin Bieber’s Lawyer, What Would You Be Doing Today?” on October 12, 2015 (subscription required).

The article focuses on the unique aspects of representing of celebrities, with Eskenazi noting, “Movie stars, musicians and other entertainers for the most part are ‘just people with the same feelings and concerns’ as regular mortals.”  However, when it comes to stars’ legal worries, Eskenazi says they tend to be a bit different.

Whether the litigation involves breach of contract or invasion of privacy, Eskenazi says the overriding question when representing a celebrity client should be, “How do you protect a person’s talent?”  She says this is “different than protecting a widget or a golf course.”

Eskenazi doesn’t comment on specific cases. However, there are an abundance of celebrity legal matters in the public sphere one can point to such as the current litigation involving Justin Beiber pending in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. 

When asked, “If you were, say, Justin Bieber’s lawyer, what would be on your plate right now?”,  Eskenazi commented, “The most common celebrity litigation involves delineation of rights, and this suit against Bieber, his mentor Usher and multiple music publishers falls into that category.”

Deciding whether to settle or litigate can also be challenging in the entertainment field since celebrities have different concerns. Eskenazi notes, “If you’re representing someone like Shell Oil or BP, they make a business decision more on dollars and cents,” she said. With talent, the litigation may turn more on concerns about public perception. “It’s not the same decision-making matrix,” she said.

“I teach entertainment law at Stanford Law School, and I ask my students ‘What is entertainment law?’ There is no such thing,” she said. Rather, it’s a combination of multiple practice areas “overlaid on to the most unique, strange industry. ... You can’t understand the legal side without understanding the business side.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Greenberg Glusker LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Greenberg Glusker LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Greenberg Glusker LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide