[Podcast] Implications of Supreme Court’s Tax Decision in Moore v. United States

BakerHostetler
Contact

BakerHostetlerA team of BakerHostetler lawyers, led by Partners Andrew Grossman and Jeff Paravano, represented clients Charles and Kathleen Moore at the Supreme Court, arguing that realization is required for federal taxation of income without apportionment pursuant to the 16th Amendment and that the mandatory repatriation tax was a tax on property. The Supreme Court issued its opinion on June 20, 2024. Join Jeff and Andrew as they discuss the Supreme Court’s opinion.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© BakerHostetler

Written by:

BakerHostetler
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

BakerHostetler on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide