Implicit "Signals" to Analysts Result in Regulation FD Liability

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact

The SEC’s settlement last week of another Regulation FD enforcement action – its third in the past 13 months – reinforces that management of public companies must avoid not only direct earnings-related or other disclosures that violate Regulation FD but also implicit “signals” that may have the same effect.1 In its most recent action, the SEC alleged that Office Depot, Inc. and its chief executive officer and former chief financial officer violated Regulation FD and Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by selectively disclosing, albeit indirectly, to analysts and institutional investors that the company would not meet analysts’ earnings estimates.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Womble Bond Dickinson

Written by:

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Womble Bond Dickinson on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide