In California, Directors Who Abstain May Still Face Liability

Allen Matkins
Contact

Section 316(a) of the California Corporations Code imposes joint and several liability on directors who approve any of the following actions:

  • The making of any distribution to shareholders to the extent contrary Sections 500 – 503;
  • The distribution of assets to shareholders after institution of dissolution proceedings of the corporation, without paying or adequately providing for, all known liabilities of the corporation (excluding untimely claims); or
  • The making of any loan or guaranty contrary to Section 315 (See D&O Loans: California Section 315 Versus Sarbanes-Oxley Section 402).

Given the potential for personal liability, some directors, deciding that discretion is the better part of valor, may simply abstain in any vote to approve these actions.  However, abstaining is neither valorous nor efficacious.  Section 316(b) deems that a director who abstains from voting will be considered to have approved the action if he or she was present at the board or committee meeting at which any of the above actions was taken.  To avoid the risk of liability under Section 316(a), a director must either not show up or vote against these actions.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide