In Case You Missed It - Interesting Items for Corporate Counsel - November 2016

Stoel Rives LLP
Contact

Stoel Rives LLP

  1. Wow. Goodness knows what changes might start flowing after January 20, or how quickly repeal of Dodd-Frank will be proposed. Just for fun, here are two law-related predictions:
    • Senator Warren’s nutty call to remove SEC Chair White because she hasn’t yet adopted campaign contribution disclosure rules, here, will be replaced by President Trump’s nutty removal of Chair White because she doesn’t have an SEC Chair look ... or stamina, or whatever; and
    • Senator Cruz’s malleable core principles, if not his unmalleable policy preferences, will be on display as he quickly admonishes any attempt to stall confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee (here).
  2. In its continued effort to remain relevant, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) unveiled the November 21, 2016 launch of QualityScore, fka QuickScore, fka Governance Risk Indicators (GRId), fka Corporate Governance Quotient. QualityScore has 15 new factors for ISS to rate, including a bunch that relate to proxy access. A summary is here. Note that you have a scant two days left to correct any ISS data that is wrong lest it lower your QualityScore! You can go here to check your data.
  3. Two days seems like a luxury, since you have only one day to comment on ISS’s draft policy changes , here. For the U.S., the proposals include:
    • Possibly recommending “no” votes on directors of companies that go public with dual class stock, and pushing for specified sunset provisions.
    • Recommending “no” votes on governance committee members if company bylaws unduly restrict shareholders’ ability to amend the bylaws.
    • For non-U.S.-based companies listed in the U.S., (a) recommending in favor of general share issuances up to 20% of outstanding shares, a common practice for non-U.S.-based companies whose home rules require shareholder approval for all share issuances, and (b) aligning voting policy on executive pay between an issuer’s home country and the U.S.
  4. The SEC adopted final rules, here, to facilitate intrastate and regional offerings. The rules:
    • modernize the intrastate offering exemption under Rule 147;
    • establish a new intrastate offering exception as Rule 147A that is similar to Rule 147 but has no restrictions on offers that may leak to out-of-state residents (like through that new-fangled contraption my kids refer to as the “Internet”) and does not require the issuer to be organized in the state where the offering is made;
    • amend Rule 504 under Regulation D to increase the $1 million offering limit to $5 million and add “bad actor” disqualifications like those that currently apply to Rule 505 and Rule 506 offerings; and
    • delete Rule 505 under Regulation D, which is supplanted by revised Rule 504.

    The SEC’s own summary of the rules is here.

    Although Rule 147 is, with the adoption of Rule 147A, superfluous for federal exemption purposes, Rule 147 was retained so that states would not need to amend their crowdfunding rules. State intrastate crowdfunding laws reference offerings exempt under Section 3(a)(11), which does not allow offers outside the state, and Rule 147. Rule 147A is a broader exemption than is permissible under Section 3(a)(11).

    The SEC’s Rule 504 changes are described as facilitating “regional” offerings because the North American Securities Administrators Association's coordinated blue sky review program is administered by region (see here). (Rule 504 does not preempt state blue sky laws.)

    Rules 147 and 147A are effective 150 days after publication of the rules in the Federal Register, Rule 504 changes are effective 60 days after publication, and you may still rely on Rule 505 for 180 days after publication.

    Nothing in Rule 147A or Rule 504 preempts state blue sky law, so expect Rule 506 (which does) to continue to be the overwhelming favorite way to raise money.

  5. The SEC’s tinkering with private offering exceptions made us wonder, what’s going on with crowdfunding these days, since we haven’t heard much or received many client inquiries in a while. “Not much,” is the answer, here.
  6. 2017 marks the first year in which that elusive median employee’s compensation must be compared to an issuer’s chief executive officer. That is to say, 2017 compensation is compared, but disclosure will not be made for year-end filers until sometime in 2018. Some resources as you ponder your approach to pay-ratio disclosure:
    • Helpful SEC CDIs (128C.01-.05) about how to identify the median employee are here (discussion here, here and here).
    • The final SEC rule, just so you have it handy, is here.

    After initial hand-wringing and concern about how difficult and expensive it will be to identify the median employee, turns out it probably won’t be, particularly for issuers with simple pay structures for most employees.

  7. The SEC issued a few other CDIs in the last month, including:
    • An unnumbered CDI, here, to let issuers know they no longer must provide seven print copies of the glossy annual report to the SEC, as long as they post it on their website.
    • A reminder that combining offerings to avoid offering size restrictions is a no-no is here (116-25).
    • CDIs on Rule 701, here re continued reliance on Rule 701 when a private company is acquired by a public company (271.04) and re when Rule 701(e) information must be provided to RSU recipients (271.24).
    • CDI on the Rule 144(d) holding period, here (532.24), re tacking the holding period of shares received as promissory note interest.
  8. The SEC’s 243-page proposed proxy rule amendments, which among other things would require a universal proxy card that allows proxy voters to vote on individual directors and not just on opposing slates, as they can at an actual shareholder meeting, and would require that shareholders be allowed to vote “against” and not just “withhold” on director nominees, is here.
  9. To supplement last month’s treasure trove of non-GAAP financial measure resources, a post-mortem on the SEC’s comment-letter push to rein in non-GAAP financial disclosures is here, noting in particular that “equal prominence,” the descriptions of why NGFMs are useful to management, and proper labelling of NGFMs were the biggest SEC target areas.
  10. October was National Cybersecurity Awareness Month , see here. As a belated celebratory gift, a roundup of cybersecurity regulation releases is here.
  11. Finally, we find interesting the 2016 BDO board survey, here, of director views on appropriate corporate governance practices. (We have more surveys of actual corporate governance practices than we know what to do with, but few on what directors think.)

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stoel Rives LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stoel Rives LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Stoel Rives LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide