Is corporate separateness at risk?

Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Contact

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

At first, many people jumped to the conclusion that this upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case threatens corporate separateness by putting corporate affiliates, who were not part of the lawsuit, at risk of having to pay the judgment. But, if you look at the facts of this case, it seems more likely that the Supreme Court will limit its decision to the reach of the Lanham Act. Here, the corporate affiliates at issue also used the infringing trademark in their name, and the allegation was that the affiliates were formed to take advantage of that trademarked name.

The U.S. Supreme Court will review whether a real estate development company's corporate affiliates should be responsible for a $46.6 million trademark infringement judgment — even though they were not defendants — in a case attorneys said Monday could have ramifications beyond the Lanham Act.

www.law360.com/...

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Written by:

Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide