Is the Tide Turning for California's Unfair Competition Law?

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

On February 25, 2009, a California appellate court issued an important decision for businesses defending against claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. (“UCL”). Prior to the passage of Proposition 64, which amended the UCL to require consumers to demonstrate “injury in fact” and “lost money or property” in order to have standing to assert a UCL claim, California was long known as a shakedown state. After the court’s decision in Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court, No. G040675 (Feb. 25, 2009), that reputation may become less deserving.

Please see full update for more information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide