It Has Never Been About Desire: New Law Clarifies Standards for Sexual Harassment Cases in California

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP
Contact

EmpBlog-10.2.2013-Rose-GavelGovernor Brown has signed Senate Bill 292 into law.  SB 292 amends the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) in response to the case of Kelley v. Conco Companies, a 2011 California Court of Appeal same-sex harassment decision that created some confusion regarding a plaintiff’s evidentiary requirement for proving a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim by implying that a plaintiff is required to prove sexual desire to prevail on such a claim.  This reading of the Kelley decision contradicts the 2006 California Court of Appeal decision in Singleton v. United States Gypsum Co., and ignores language in the leading United States Supreme Court decision on same-sex sexual harassment, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.  SB 292 amends FEHA to specifically state that sexual harassing conduct need not be motivated by sexual desire.  Sexually harassing conduct is wrong, regardless of motivation.

Written by:

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide