Connecticut and Vermont Security Breach Amendments Demonstrate a Growing Trend: AG Notice Requirements

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

Originally published in Privacy & Security Law Report - 11 PVLR 26, 06/25/2012. Copyright 2012 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com.

Since early May of this year, both Connecticut and Vermont amended their security breach notification laws to require notice to each state’s respective state attorney general (AG) of data security breaches. The Connecticut and Vermont amendments and similar amendments made by other states last year demonstrate a growing national trend in state data security legislation—state reconsideration of, and ultimately amendments to, the requirements of existing state security breach notification laws.

Background

Since California’s landmark security breach notification law went into effect July 1, 2003, nearly every state has adopted a similar law. While the last state law to be enacted went into effect only last year (Mississippi), many, if not most, states enacted a law similar to the California law within five years. Today, 46 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, have security breach notification laws on the books.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide