Kentucky Restricts Marketing for Non-Bank Entities and Provides Clarity in Residential Real Estate Transactions

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

[co-author: Brandon Mohamad*]

On April 4, Kentucky enacted HB 88, which will amend laws related to unlawful trade practices, and prohibit entities that are not banks or trust companies from:

  • suggesting that they are engaged in banking or trust activities; and
  • using the name, trademark, logo, or symbol of any financial institution or any marks that resemble those of any financial institution (except where such use has been consented to “in written or electronic format”).

HB 88 also seeks to “establish guidelines and restrictions for service agreements in residential real estate transactions to provide clarity and structure in these dealings.” The act specifies that service agreements related to residential real property cannot establish rights or duties that extend more than two years beyond their start date. Furthermore, unless exceptions apply, such agreements cannot:

  • be binding on future owners of the property;
  • impose a lien, encumbrance, or other real property interest on the property;
  • require or permit recording of the agreement;
  • restrict the resolution of disputes to binding arbitration;
  • waive the owner’s rights to class action relief; or
  • allow transfer of the service provider’s rights to someone else without the written agreement of the owner.

*Brandon Mohamad is a law clerk in the firm’s New York office.

On April 17, the Kansas Legislature signed SB 345, to become the most recent state to enact disclosure requirements for small business lenders.

The law’s requirements apply to “providers” which are defined as persons who consummate more than five commercial financing transactions with businesses located in Kansas in a calendar year.

Putting it into Practice: Non-bank entities operating in Kentucky are encouraged to review and enhance their compliance programs to align with the new law’s requirements on marketing practices. Moreover, Kentucky’s regulations on service providers is more focused on real estate brokers and follows soon after the National Association of Realtors’ recent proposed settlement, which still faces judicial approval.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact
more
less

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide