Magistrate Recommends Certain Declaratory Judgment Claims Of Non-Infringement Be Dismissed With Leave To Amend

Morris James LLP
Contact

Intel Corporation v. Future Link Systems, LLC, C.A. No. 14-377-LPS, February 12, 2015.

Burke, M.J. Magistrate issues a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction be granted in part and denied in part. Oral argument was heard on November 20, 2014.

Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that it does not infringe defendant’s patents. Defendant asserts that plaintiff lacks standing, that direct and indirect non-infringement claims fail to state a claim, and the case should be dismissed. Plaintiff asserts subject matter jurisdiction exists based upon due to infringement allegation made against plaintiff’s customers. The court disagrees with defendant’s argument that a supplier plaintiff can never have standing to sue a patentee for direct non-infringement. Plaintiff, by making allegedly infringing computer components and selling them to customers would perform its own independent acts of infringement, assuming infringement.  The court finds no actual controversy however with respect to method claims since there are no allegations how the steps of the method are to be performed.  No actual controversy exists with respect to induced infringement in the absence of allegations that plaintiff encouraged infringement. In addition, The contributory infringement claims are insufficiently pled  in the absence of allegations that its products cannot be used in a non-infringing manner.  No subject matter jurisdiction exists for the remaining patents owned by defendant. Jurisdiction based on an obligation to indemnify the customers is insufficiently plead where the complaint alleges merely that request for indemnification have been made.  The Magistrate recommends that the court grant plaintiff leave to amend.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Morris James LLP

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide