Magistrate’s Recommendation That The Case Be Dismissed For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Is Adopted

Morris James LLP
Contact

Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC et al. v. Gilead Sciences Inc. et al., C.A. Nos. 13-1987-LPS, 14-109-LPS, 14-846-LPS, November 16, 2016.

Stark, C. J. Plaintiff’s objections are overruled and magistrate’s report and recommendations adopted in full.

This case involves a challenge to the result of a PTO interference declared after September 15, 2012.  The magistrate earlier recommended that defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction be granted. Plaintiffs objected, and the court finds it is without jurisdiction to resolve the dispute.  Plaintiff has an appeal pending in the Federal Circuit, and it may also appeal this decision.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide