Maine DEP Extends CUU Designations by Two Years Under PFAS in Products Law

DLA Piper
Contact

DLA Piper

As discussed in our prior alert, Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) published a proposed rule prescribing procedures and criteria for determining Currently Unavoidable Uses (CUU) of intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in products subject to Maine’s PFAS in Products law (38 M.R.S. § 1614).

Following the proposed rule’s comment period, DEP published its comment responses, announcing its intention to extend the allowable timeframe for submitting CUU designation requests for products from three years to five years before a product’s applicable sales prohibition. On April 7, 2025, Maine’s Board of Environmental Protection voted to adopt DEP’s revisions to its proposed rule, thereby solidifying this change.

Maine’s amended PFAS in Products law restricts intentionally added PFAS in products through staggered sales and distribution prohibitions according to categorical product type. Under DEP’s now-final implementing rule, CUU requests for products scheduled to be prohibited by the January 1, 2026 deadline (eg, cleaning, cookware, cosmetic, and textile products) are due by June 1, 2025. All other products affected by Maine DEP’s rolling sales prohibitions may be submitted as far in advance as 60 months (five years), and no later than 18 months (one and a half years), before the respective sales prohibition. Notably, the five-year CUU application period for products subject to the PFAS in Product law’s January 1, 2029 prohibitions (eg, artificial turf, outdoor apparel) has already commenced.

The extended CUU application timeframe may be a positive development for industry stakeholders. Applicants can now apply earlier, pursue a faster response from DEP, and have more time to make critical production and supply chain decisions based on CUU availability.

Despite industry efforts to request additional rule changes, DEP only agreed to the CUU timeline adjustment. Notably, DEP refused to exclude fluoropolymers from the law’s reach or otherwise categorically deem their use as a CUU. DEP also rejected requests for a single CUU submission process for products that serve multiple industries, reasoning that PFAS alternative availability and product utility to health, safety, or functioning of society may vary by industry use. Ultimately, DEP’s updated rulemaking likely demonstrates the Agency’s commitment to proceeding with the state’s PFAS in Products law largely as-is.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© DLA Piper

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

DLA Piper on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide