Making the Connection - What Do Recent SEC Enforcement Actions Mean for Cyber Controls?

On July 18, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed most of the claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) against SolarWinds Corp. and its Chief Information Security Officer in SEC v. SolarWinds Corp. et al. in connection with the SUNBURST attack. Among other things, the decision provides important perspective to the debate regarding whether controls associated with cybersecurity matters are covered by the internal accounting controls provisions of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The court's dismissal in SolarWinds follows in sharp contrast to the Commission's June 18, 2024 settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company relating to cybersecurity incidents, including violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) with regard to internal accounting controls, and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a) with regard to disclosure controls and procedures (“DCP”).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© WilmerHale

Written by:

WilmerHale
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

WilmerHale on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide