Motions for judgment on the pleadings based on section 101 are denied

Morris James LLP
Contact

Evolved Wireless LLC v. Apple Inc., et al., C.A. Nos. 15-542-SLR; 15-543-SLR; 15-544-SLR; 15-545-SLR; 15-546-SLR; 15-547-SLR, October 31, 2016.

Stark, C. J. Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings are denied.

The disputed technology relates to mobile phones and devices using the LTE standard. The patents claim improved functionality with faster wireless voice and data transmissions. Defendants argue that the patents-in-suit are directed to abstract ideas and are therefore unpatentable under Mayo and Alice. Specifically, they argue that the disputed claims are directed to a mathematical algorithm for generating a code sequence. The court finds that the patents are directed to technological improvements involving specific problems in a wireless communications system .The motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Whether the patent claims are invalid under sections 102 or 103 is reserved for another day.  The court now decides only that the claims are patentable under section 101.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide