Navigating Sites with PFAS Through the Superfund Process Is Going to Be a Bumpy Ride

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

PFAS.jpgFor most of this century, I’ve been asked with some regularity whether Superfund was dead. I’ve always considered that question to be a victory of hope over expectation. Notwithstanding frequent criticism, frequently deserved, Superfund refuses to go away. As I made clear in a post this past April, the developing awareness of the problems caused by PFAS has pretty much proved Mark Twain once more to be on point. The reports of the death of Superfund have been greatly exaggerated.

All of this brings us to a report last week from Inside EPA (subscription required), which discussed EPA’s use of the Five-Year Review process to require PRPs to investigate the potential presence of PFAS at Superfund sites. In the article, an industry attorney complained that such Five-Year Reviews are “fishing expeditions”. I have some sympathy for this concern. If I may mix my metaphors, given the near omnipresence of PFAS, it’s somewhat akin to a fishing expedition conducted in a barrel of fish. You may find some fish, but that doesn’t mean it will be a meaningful exercise.

If I may hark back to my April post, it’s difficult to complain about EPA’s use of the Five-Year Review process to try to determine if there have been releases of PFAS at a Superfund site. On the other hand, precisely because PFAS are omnipresent, it is totally reasonable to complain about EPA’s tendency – (I’m being generous here; it would be more accurate to talk about EPA’s knee-jerk reaction) – to assume that any PFAS that are found are, in fact, the responsibility of the PRPs. EPA’s habit of simply going after the deep pocket in hand rather than the truly responsible party in the bush is one of the reasons why Superfund, or at least EPA’s administration of Superfund, is looked on with such disdain. 

At a practical level, I advise PRPs to prepare for a steady stream of such Five-Year Review requests. Some PFAS are hazardous substances, and more have had MCLs promulgated. It’s one environmental issue that seems to resonate with the public. If I can pull out one more old pop culture reference, it’s tough to beat Bette Davis in All About Eve. “Fasten your seatbelts. It’s going to be a bumpy [ride].”

 See video here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide