New Medicare Conditional Payment Case: Federal Court Requires CMS To Perform Surgery On Its Primary Plan Reimbursement Demands

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
Contact

Doctors often treat Medicare beneficiaries for accident related injuries (for which a “primary” auto or workers’ compensation carrier must reimburse Medicare) and unrelated maladies at the same visit. Billing for the visit cites multiple diagnosis codes, but a single charge for treatment of both an accident related back injury and unrelated hypertension, or gout for example.

This may be efficient for the doctor and patient, but it’s been a pain in the neck for primary plans, because until now CMS has demanded reimbursement for the total charge…gout and all.  This can make primary payors’ blood boil. They get stuck with both related and unrelated charges, paying for high blood pressure treatment in addition to the back injury. 

But some relief may be at hand. Last month a California Federal District Judge required CMS to take a scalpel to such single medical expense charges with multiple diagnosis codes. In CIGA v Burwell 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1681, (an astute and well-reasoned opinion) Judge Wright noted that primary plans are only required to reimburse CMS for an “item or [individual] service” for which the primary plan bears responsibility. In light of this itemized, statutory directive, he ordered CMS to slice out unrelated charges before demanding reimbursement from primary plans.

CMS protested: How are we supposed to figure out how much of a single charge is attributable to the related injury as opposed to other maladies? The Judge was unsympathetic: CMS that’s your problem – it may be more difficult than your current procedure, but it must be done.

This is a great decision for workers’ compensation carriers or bodily injury carriers (primary plans) required to reimburse Medicare. It could save plans big money, while also being fair to all. Let’s hope this type of common sense spreads…. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide