New York Enacts New Law for Workers Facing Job-Related Mental Injury

Goldberg Segalla
Contact

Goldberg Segalla

Key Takeaways:

  • Kathy Hochul has signed a bill expanding the statutory carveout applied to police officers, firefighters, and EMTs who filed a claim for mental injury due to extraordinary work-related stress

  • S.6635/A.5745 now allows all workers to apply for Workers’ Compensation for extraordinary work-related stress

  • The law takes effect January 1

Under S.6635/A.5745:

Where a [worker] files a claim for mental injury premised upon extraordinary work-related stress incurred at [work], the board may not disallow the claim upon a factual finding that the stress was not greater than that which usually occurs in the normal work environment.

A major part of this law is that now all employees in New York can apply for workers’ compensation if they feel they are undergoing a mental health crisis caused by their job. In the past, this option was only available for select first responder positions.

Unlike other accidental injuries, there are two requirements in a claimant’s case that are unique to stress claims. In addition to all ordinary requirements the claimant has to meet, the claimant will also be required to show the stress to which he or she was subjected to at work was “greater than the usual irritations to which all workers are occasionally subjected,” and the claimant may also need to show that the disability was not the direct consequence of a lawful personnel decision taken in good faith. In 2017, legislation was enacted to remove the restriction that the stress suffered by designated first responders no longer needs to be greater than the normal stress sustained by similar workers.

Given the expansion of the previous statutory carveout for first-responder positions and the reduction in the restriction for compensability, there is likely to be an increase in claims filed due to extraordinary work-related stress. For instance, under the prior legislation, a bank teller who was at work during a robbery had a viable stress claim although they are not a first responder, as the stress due to the robbery is greater than the usual irritations to which all workers are occasionally subjected. Under the new legislation a bank teller may seek a stress claim based on the usual irritations of what working as a bank teller entails.

As with physical injuries, the question of whether a causal relationship exists between a work activity and an ensuring psychological disability is an issue of fact for resolution by the Workers’ Compensation Board. The onus to determine what qualifies as “extraordinary,” a standard that is not defined by statute, will be placed on law judges. Extensive litigation on the issue of what constitutes “extraordinary” stress and increased administrative expenses on IMEs and medical testimony may resolve on a case-by-case basis.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Goldberg Segalla

Written by:

Goldberg Segalla
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Goldberg Segalla on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide