Observation Services at Risk Once More

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact

Just as you hospitals have their clinicians understanding that they need to specifically order observation services, the MACs and RACs have a new way to deny observation claims. At a recent speech, the Medical Director of the Medicare Administrative Contractor Cahaba (which processes claims for many of the for-profit systems out of Nashville), said that observation orders stating "admit" instead of "referred" to observation would be invalid. The medical director reasoned that there was no such category as an observation patient so therefore a patient cannot be "admitted" to observation.

However, the confusion regarding the wording seems to come directly from CMS. From January 2006 until January 2010, CMS Claims Processing Manual Chapter 4, §290.3.3 stated repeatedly that providers could make a "direct admission to observation." In January of 2010, the section was repealed and in newly adopted adjacent manual provisions CMS started using the phrase "referred to observation."

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide