OCC files amicus brief supporting a preliminary injunction on the Illinois’ Interchange Fee Prohibition Act

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On October 2, the OCC filed an amicus brief supporting several banking associations’ motion for a preliminary injunction against the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act (IFPA or the Act) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the Governor of Illinois signed into law the IFPA banning credit or debit card issuers and any other entity that facilitates or processes electronic payments from charging an interchange fee on the tax or gratuity of a transaction. Under the IFPA, the Act prohibits banks and others involved in an electronic payment transaction (except the merchant) from transferring or using data from that transaction except to facilitate or process the transaction, or as required by law. Several bank associations quickly challenged this law to prevent its implementation, seeking a preliminary injunction and asking the court to declare the Act preempted, unconstitutional and invalid (covered by InfoBytes here).
 

The OCC argued the IFPA’s restrictions on interchange fees and data usage significantly interfere with national banks’ federally authorized powers under the National Bank Act (NBA) to process debit and credit card transactions and charge fees for those services. The OCC emphasized the IFPA’s prohibition on charging interchange fees on tax and gratuity portions of transactions and its limitations on the use of transaction data would impose operational burdens on national banks and could disrupt the national payment system. The OCC contended that such state-level restrictions could lead to increased costs, reduced services and weakened fraud protection for consumers, ultimately fragmenting the nationwide payments system.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide