Oregon Update: Two Significant Developments in the Project Labor Agreement and Community Work Agreement Saga

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Contact

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

State judge enjoins governor's administration from enforcing EO 24-31; Oregon Supreme Court determines ODOT did not comply with rulemaking requirements for CWA

There have been two significant developments at the end of March and early April 2025 regarding PLAs and CWAs in Oregon.

We've previously addressed Oregon Gov. Kotek's Executive Order No. 24-31 requiring the use of Project Labor Agreements on certain state construction projects. On March 24, 2025, Marion County Circuit Judge Thomas M. Hart issued a preliminary injunction from the bench preventing state agencies from enforcing EO 24-31. Based upon our reading of the transcript of the hearing, Judge Hart reserved decision on whether or not EO 24-31 is an unconstitutional separation-of-powers violation, or whether it is unenforceable as a violation of the open and competitive bidding requirements in Oregon's Public Contracting Code, ORS 279A.005 et seq.

Separately, on April 10, 2025, the Oregon Supreme Court determined that the Oregon Department of Transportation ("ODOT") failed to follow the rulemaking requirements of Oregon's Administration Procedures Act in developing the CWA for use on ODOT projects. Oregon-Columbia Ch. of the Assoc. Gen. Contr. of Am. [("AGC")] v. Dept. of Transp., 373 Or 405, 407-08, (2025) (En Banc). As a result, the Court determined that the CWA is an "invalidly promulgated rule." Id. at 408. The Court rejected ODOT's argument that the CWA was not a "rule," finding that the "CWA is an ODOT statement that prescribes policies that generally apply to its community benefit program[1]" and "[t]hat makes it a 'rule' under the APA[.]" Id.

It will be interesting to see how the Court's decision in AGC will impact the pending litigation in Marion County Circuit Court relating to EO 24-31.


[1] The Court found that such program was authorized under ORS 279C.308, relating to "community benefit project[s]," and ODOT's adoption of its rule, subject to that statutory authority, relating to "Community Benefit Program[s]" at OAR 731-005-0900(2).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Written by:

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide