Introduction
Predictions about the arrival of fault-tolerant quantum computing and commercially viable quantum computing vary widely. Some experts estimate that within the next three to five years, we may see early quantum advantage in specialized fields such as materials science, cryptography, and optimization, particularly using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Others believe fault-tolerant quantum computing – capable of reliably outperforming classical systems at scale – is at least a decade away. Some liken quantum’s trajectory to artificial intelligence, waiting for its own “ChatGPT moment” – a breakthrough that accelerates commercial adoption.
But whether large-scale quantum computing is three years away or ten, the race to secure intellectual property has already begun. Companies, research institutions, and governments are aggressively patenting quantum hardware, error correction methods, and quantum algorithms, recognizing that early control over key innovations will shape the future competitive landscape of this transformative technology.
A recent global patent report from the Quantum Consortium highlights this trend: over the past year, patent filings in quantum computing have surged by 50 percent, with over 7,000 unique patent families worldwide. While the United States leads in quantum patent filings, China and Europe are rapidly increasing their patent activity, positioning themselves as major players in the race for quantum IP.
Quantum innovations eligible for patent protection
Innovations in quantum computing span both hardware and software, each presenting unique opportunities and challenges in the patent landscape.
1. Hardware innovations
- Qubit modalities (eg, superconducting, trapped ions, topological qubits)
- Quantum gates and circuits
- Quantum processors and chips
- Cryogenic and control systems
- Quantum sensors and measurement devices
2. Software innovations
- Quantum algorithms (eg, quantum machine learning, quantum optimization, quantum cryptography)
- Error mitigation and error correction algorithms
- Quantum-classical hybrid algorithms (ie, classical and quantum processors working together)
Each of these categories raises specific hurdles in patent eligibility, enablement, and prior art, making it essential for applicants to navigate the quantum patent landscape carefully.
Challenges in patenting quantum technologies
While quantum computing shares some patenting challenges with classical computing, its unique theoretical foundations and rapid evolution introduce additional complexities.
1. Prior art complexity
Unlike other emerging technologies like blockchain or artificial intelligence, quantum computing is heavily driven by academia and research institutions. While the patent landscape is expanding rapidly, there is also a proliferation of non-patent literature that complicates prior art searches.
For example, a search for “quantum” on arXiv – an online research repository – yields over 13,000 results, creating significant hurdles for patent examiners and applicants trying to establish novelty.
2. Subject matter eligibility
This challenge is particularly relevant for software-based quantum innovations. In the United States, patentable subject matter includes new and useful processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter. While software can be patentable, it faces stricter eligibility criteria, particularly under Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, which limits patents on abstract ideas.
Drafting patent applications in this space requires deep technical and legal expertise to navigate these challenges effectively, ensuring that the claims of the application are tied to the technological improvement of the invention.
3. The rapidly evolving nature of quantum computing
Quantum computing is advancing at an unprecedented pace, creating potential risks for patent longevity. Software and Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-based computing innovations may become obsolete before a patent is granted, given the rapid evolution of quantum algorithms and hardware capabilities.
However, foundational quantum computing patents – such as qubit fabrication techniques, quantum error correction architectures, and cryogenic control systems – are likely to remain valuable in the long term, as they provide the building blocks for future fault-tolerant quantum computers.
4. International patent considerations
The challenges discussed so far focus on US patent law, but for companies building global IP portfolios, international patenting adds another layer of complexity. Patent strategies for quantum technologies should account for jurisdictional differences.
For example, Europe’s patent system follows different rules, often requiring technical implementation details that go beyond US requirements. Meanwhile, China has ramped up its quantum patent filings, potentially influencing the competitive patent landscape by creating an additional pool of prior art.
For quantum computing companies seeking broad international protection, understanding the intricacies of different jurisdictions is critical to avoiding costly pitfalls both domestically and internationally.
Conclusion
While fault-tolerant quantum computing and commercially viable quantum computing remain several years – if not a decade – away, the race for patents has already begun. As companies, universities, and governments compete to secure early control over key quantum innovations, the patent landscape is evolving rapidly.
However, quantum patent applicants face significant challenges, including:
- A rapidly growing body of prior art
- Strict subject matter eligibility requirements, especially for software-based inventions
- The risk of obsolescence given the rapid pace of technological advancements
- Complexities in securing international patent protection
Navigating this landscape involves a strategic approach, carefully drafting claims to maximize enforceability, and staying informed on rapidly changing legal frameworks for quantum technologies.
As quantum computing moves closer to commercial viability, those who establish strong patent positions today will be well-positioned to lead the industry tomorrow.
[View source.]
