We can’t provide any commentary or analysis, because of our firm’s involvement in the litigation. But we thought our readers would benefit from knowing about three recent opinions excluding certain plaintiff experts in an HT case.

Just the holdings, then:

Opinion #1: Hines v. Wyeth, 2011 WL 2680814 (S.D.W. Va. July 8, 2011). Experts: Drs. Wayne Tilley and Donald Austin. Opinions: Oral micronized progesterone as an alternative safer design. Result: Excluded. Reasons: Reliance on statistically insignificant evidence. Reliance on animal studies.