PTAB Institutes Sarepta’s IPR

Goodwin
Contact

Goodwin

As we previously reported, REGENXBIO’s litigation against Sarepta, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 (the “’274 patent”) by Sarepta’s gene therapy product, was stayed pending resolution of Sarepta’s IPR against the ’274 patent.

The PTAB now has granted institution of Sarepta’s IPR, which challenges claims 1, 3-6, and 8 of the ’274 patent as obvious over four prior art references: US 2003/0138772 A1 (“’772 Publication”), Qing Xie et al., The atomic structure of adeno-associated virus (AAV-2), a vector for human gene therapy, 99 Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci., 10405–10410 (2002) (“Xie”), Stephen Snowdy, Nuclear targeting by adeno-associated virus capsid proteins and virions (2003) (Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)  (“Snowdy”), and/or Stewart A. Fabb et al., Adeno-associated virus vector gene transfer and sarcolemmal expression of a 144 kDa micro-dystrophin effectively restores the dystrophin-associated protein complex and inhibits myofiber degeneration in nude/mdx mice, 11 Human Molecular Genetics 733–741 (2002) (“Fabb”).

Patent Owner’s response is due November 14, 2024, with Petitioner’s reply due February 6, 2025, and Patent Owner’s sur-reply due March 20, 2025.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Goodwin

Written by:

Goodwin
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Goodwin on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide