For some weeks now, US Senate and House conferees have been involved in a delicate, but sometimes bareknuckled, process of reconciliation. The Conference Committee, charged with reconciling differences between the version of the financial regulatory reform bill passed by the House of Representatives in December 2009 and the bill passed in late May 2010 by the Senate, has had to tackle quite a number of controversial, and often arcane, matters. So many issues, in fact, that debate continued into the wee hours of the morning of June 25th.
Yesterday, we shared a brief scorecard on what we regard as some of the most significant issues considered by the Conference Committee—please see Part I: (see document below for link).
The following includes Part II of our scorecard (or, Scorecard on Regulatory Reform, The Sequel). Over the course of the next few days, more complete analysis will follow. More information on regulatory reform measures is available from our dedicated webpage at: (see document below for link).
Please see full publication below for more information.