Remedies for Refusing to Consummate a Settlement Agreement Reached at Mediation

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Contact

Raising an allegation that a party has not participated in the mediation process in good faith has historically been a sensitive hot-button issue for mediators, parties, and even the courts. In fact, even on occasions where the charge is made and the question has been posed to a court, at a mediation unless there is some clear objective line that one of the parties crossed, such as a failure to appear, failure to have a party representative with knowledge or authority attend, or a failure to provide a mediation statement. Courts regularly make clear that while mediation may be mandatory, settling at a mediation is not. However, what if parties have reached some form of agreement at mediation, then refuse to move forward to consummate the same? Is that also bad faith? What will courts do in such a scenario?

Originally published from the ABI Journal, Vol XLI, No 4 - April 2022.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide