Summary Judgment Motions Regarding Written Description And Enablement Are Denied

Morris James LLP
Contact

Johns Hopkins University v. 454 Life Sciences Corporation,  C.A. No. 13-1853 - LPS, May 2, 2016.

Stark, C. J.  Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Briefing was completed on February 16, 2016.

Plaintiff filed this action to review the final decision and judgment of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment that its priority date with respect to the count is no later than June 5, 2003 is granted.  Its motions that certain patent applications fail to comply with written description and enablement requirements are denied. Its motion that a certain patent application is anticipated is denied. Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment regarding written description and enablement is denied.  The court finds material issues of fact preclude summary judgment regarding written description and enablement.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide