Ten Years after Shelby County: The Effect of Ending Preclearance on Voting Rights

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
Contact

In 2013, a divided Supreme Court held in Shelby County v. Holder that Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was unconstitutional, ending its preclearance requirement in states with a history of discriminatory voting practices. The decision was widely viewed by its critics as having gutted the Voting Rights Act. In the majority opinion, Chief Justice Roberts found that so much progress had been made in securing voting rights from 1965 to 2013 that there was no longer a need to impose special restrictions to protect voting rights in states with a history of discrimination...

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

Written by:

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide