Tenth Circuit Finds Plan Administrator Has No Duty to Inquire into Authenticity of Participant’s Beneficiary Designation

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog
Contact

Plaintiff Kristopher Towles, the son of a deceased participant of a life insurance plan, challenged the plan’s decision to pay the life insurance proceeds to the deceased’s husband, contending that the beneficiary form replacing him with the deceased husband had been forged. After five attempts to state a claim, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to plead a viable claim. The Tenth Circuit affirmed and further noted that Kristopher’s allegations that the forms were forged failed to state a claim under ERISA because a plan administrator has no duty to inquire into the authenticity of the forms if it had “no reason to suspect that anything was amiss.” The case is Yarbary v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP, No. 14-3101, 2014 WL 6679881 (10th Cir. Nov. 24, 2014).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide