The exclusion fiasco

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.
Contact

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

Scrivener’s error is a mistake made by someone who is writing or copying something down, like a typo or a misspelling. It’s also a losing argument for most mistakes in a retirement plan document.

Intent is a nice idea. It’s a reminder of where you want to spend your attention and energy. The problem with intent is that if you had intended to exclude certain classifications of employees and the plan document didn’t do that, no time machine can make you fix that error. People who should have been excluded are included if the plan document was quiet on their ineligibility. That means you will have to make corrective contributions to employees you wanted to exclude from 401(k) participation. A retroactive amendment to exclude them, won’t pass muster with the Internal revenue Service and it certainly won’t pass muster with the Department of Labor.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide