The Hughes Lesson: When You Use the Forms, Use Your Head.

Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.
Contact

This article discusses the recent Missouri appellate court decision in Hughes v. Hughes, 2016 Mo.App. LEXIS 1280 (Mo.App. E.D. Dec. 13, 2016). The Eastern District reversed a trial court ruling that the maintenance in the case was not modifiable, but affirmed the trial court's ultimate decision to allow my client to keep her maintenance. What made the appeal unusual is that two of the three judges wrote separate dissents. So, in essence, the judges had three different opinions.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.

Written by:

Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide