The Local Patent Rules regarding infringement contentions do not apply to this Hatch-Waxman case.

Robins Kaplan LLP
Contact

Kowa Company Ltd. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., et al.

Case Number: 1:14-cv-02497-PAC

Defendant Mylan asked the court to apply the Local Patent Rules to the case, specifically requiring plaintiff to serve its disclosure of asserted claims and preliminary infringement contentions no more than 60 days after the initial scheduling conference (or, by December 5, 2014). Judge Crotty refused the request, stating “Under Local Patent Rule 1, the Court ‘may modify the obligations or deadlines set forth in these Local Patent Rules based on the circumstances of any particular case . . .’ [13-misc-00119.] In light of the processes of the Hatch-Waxman act, Local Patent Rule 6 does not apply. Local civil Rule 33.3c is applicable.

In related issues:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Robins Kaplan LLP

Written by:

Robins Kaplan LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Robins Kaplan LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide