The Mixed Bag of Edwards v. Arthur Anderson: Narrow Restraints in Non-Competition Agreements Are Not Allowed, Indemnity Rights Are Unwaivable But Broad Releases of "Any and All Claims" Are Valid

Littler
Contact
LinkedIn
Facebook
X
Send
Embed

The California Supreme Court?s opinion in Edwards v. Arthur Anderson L.L.P., reinforces California?s public policy against enforcing covenants not to compete but at the same time found that broad releases of ?any and all claims? in agreements are valid and do not include unwaivable claims.

Please see full newsletter for more information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

View PDF
Download PDF [457KB]
Email
Report

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Send Report

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Littler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Littler
Littler
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Littler on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign Up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide