Third District Court Quashes Order Granting Motion for Protective Order Relating to a Corporate Representative’s Deposition

Marshall Dennehey
Contact

Marshall Dennehey

Hamilton v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Fla. 3rd DCA, 3D23-1934, May 1, 2024

The petitioner in this matter (the plaintiff below) sought certiorari review of a discovery order granting a motion for protective order filed below by the defendant. The order allowed the respondent (the defendant below) to designate as privileged any portion of the claim file’s contents, even those portions of the file relied upon by the witness during the corporate representative’s testimony.

The Third DCA quashed the Protective Order and ordered production of any documents relied upon by the corporate representative. The court reasoned the aforementioned portion of the order violated section 90.613 of the Florida Statutes (2023). The statute states: “[w]hen a witness uses a writing or other item to refresh memory when testifying, an adverse party is entitled to have such writing or other item produced at the hearing, to inspect it, to cross-examine the witness thereon, and to introduce it, or, in the case of a writing, to introduce those portions which relate to the testimony of the witness, in evidence.” Based on the statute, the Third District Court of Appeal concluded the party’s privilege objections are deemed waived when a party used documents to refresh the recollection of that party’s witness.

Written by:

Marshall Dennehey
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Marshall Dennehey on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide