The US has pivoted in its stance on the global management of plastic production and pollution, with significant potential impacts for industry. The shift comes amid ongoing negotiations toward a UN treaty aimed at addressing the growing issue of plastic pollution. The Biden Administration’s change in position aligns with a coalition of “high-ambition” countries advocating for more stringent measures to curb plastic production and represents a larger federal strategy for addressing plastic pollution.
Negotiations for the UN treaty began in March 2022, with the goal of ending plastic pollution. The treaty is expected to be finalized by 2025. Throughout these negotiations, the US has historically aligned itself with oil-producing nations and industry groups that focus on waste management and recycling rather than production limits. However, the US has now diverged from this group, joining the “high-ambition” coalition of over 60 countries, including other major Western economies such as Canada, the UK, Switzerland, and France.
US policy reversal: Restrictions on plastic production
The US now supports the establishment of restrictions on plastic production – a significant departure from its previous position. The change may influence other countries, particularly those that have been undecided, to adopt similar stances. The US also reportedly intends to back the creation of a list of problematic plastics and hazardous chemicals, which could lead to specific bans or restrictions.
Polling indicates general public support for ambitious policies on plastic pollution and eliminating unnecessary plastic products and toxic chemicals. Environmental organizations also view decreased plastic production as a critical step toward meaningful action against plastic pollution and climate change. Industry response to the US policy shift, on the other hand, has been overwhelmingly negative. Key industry leaders have suggested the move responds to activist pressure at the cost of US manufacturers, plastics innovation, and economic stability.
Implications for treaty negotiations
The US policy shift will likely influence the final round of treaty negotiations in Busan, South Korea this November 25 through December 1. Environmental advocates hope the US will actively promote the new position and support the “Bridge to Busan” initiative, which seeks to maintain production targets within the treaty text.
Conclusion
The US turn toward limits on plastic production marks a substantial change in the global dialogue on plastic pollution, and it could reshape the upcoming treaty negotiations and invite further international commitments to address plastic pollution. But the landscape is complicated by the intricacies of multilateral negotiations and the interplay between environmental policy and economic interests. Industry cites concerns about the economic impact of such measures and the challenge they may pose to innovation and new technologies in sustainable plastics. Environmentalists advocate immediate and decisive action to ensure a sustainable future. The outcome of the Busan negotiations will be pivotal in determining how that balance is struck.
[View source.]
