[Webinar] Design Patents Post-LKQ v. GM: Navigating New Obviousness Test for Design Patents

July 10th, 1:00 pm - 2:30 pm EDT
Strafford
Contact
July 10th, 2024
1:00 PM - 2:30 PM EDT
$ 278.00

Note: 20% discount for JD Supra subscibers reflected in checkout.

A live 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A


This CLE webinar will guide patent counsel on the Federal Circuit's recent decision in LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations L.L.C. (May 21, 2024) and its implications for design patents. The panel will discuss the new test for obviousness and what hurdles it will present for design patents. The panel will offer guidance addressing obviousness issues in design patents.

Description

After applying the Rosen-Durling test for obviousness for over 25 years, the Federal Circuit has turned the design patent world on its head. In the recent en banc decision, the Federal Circuit rejected the Rosen-Durling test, finding the test was "improperly rigid." The court determined that the test for obviousness that is used for utility patents should also be used for design patents.

The test for obviousness for utility patents was established in Graham v. John Deere (U.S. 1966) and KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (U.S. 2007). The USPTO issued a memorandum on May 22, 2024, to provide guidance and instructions on evaluating obviousness in design patent applications and design patents.

The decision in LKQ could make it tougher to get design patents. And could provide an easier path to invalidate design patents. Design patent counsel need to understand the new test for obviousness to carefully draft patent applications to avoid obviousness rejections and to be prepared to address them when they do arise.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines the Federal Circuit's decision in LKQ and its implications for design patents. The panel will discuss the new test for obviousness and what hurdles it will present for design patents. The panel will offer guidance addressing obviousness issues in design patents.

Outline

  1. LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations L.L.C. (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2024)
  2. New test for obviousness
  3. Challenges for design patents under the new test
  4. Best practices

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • How will the Federal Circuit's decision and USPTO guidance change obviousness for design patents?
  • What lessons can design patent counsel learn from the application of the obviousness test in utility patents?
  • What are the steps that design patent applicants can take to stand up to obviousness rejections?

FACULTY

Carani, Christopher

Christopher V. Carani
Shareholder
McAndrews Held & Malloy

Mr. Carani is nationally recognized in the field of design law, regarding the protection and enforcement of aesthetic design through the use of design patents, copyrights and trade dress. A registered attorney before the USPTO, Mr. Carani secures and enforces design rights for some of the world’s most design-centric companies and designers. He has litigated design right cases in subject matter areas ranging from footwear and apparel to medical devices and furniture. In 2016, IAM Magazine included Mr. Carani in its IAM 1000 referring to him as one of the U.S.’s “pre-eminent design law experts.” He is currently the Chair of the AIPPI Design Rights Committee and former Chair of both the ABA’s Design Rights Committee and AIPLA Committee on Industrial Designs. Mr. Carani is the Editor-in-Chief of the forthcoming book entitled “Design Rights: Functionality and Scope of Protection.” The book will be published in October of 2017 by publisher Walters Klowers N.V.

Durkin, Tracy-Gene

Tracy-Gene Durkin
Director
Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox

Ms. Durkin heads the firm’s Mechanical and Design Patent Group. With nearly 30 years of experience obtaining and enforcing IP rights, she has a deep understanding of utility and design patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Ms. Durkin has been an Adjunct Professor at George Mason University Law School and has spoken internationally on topics such as the interplay between design patents and trade dress, and protection of user interface and the user experience. She is currently a Vice Chair of the Industrial Designs Committee of IP Section of the ABA.

Katz, Robert

Robert S. Katz
Principal Shareholder
Banner Witcoff

Both nationally and internationally, Mr. Katz is considered one of the premier practitioners in the field of industrial designs, leading the way in the procurement and enforcement of design patents. On behalf of the firm’s clients, he has helped procure more than 10,000 design patents in the U.S. and more than 30,000 design patents/registrations outside the U.S. and has helped to successfully enforce over 100 design patents. Leaders from foreign design patent offices have consulted with him regarding industrial design policies, and he has served as an expert in design patent litigations. Mr. Katz holds leadership positions in several professional organizations, including ABA, AIPLA, FICPI and INTA. He is the past Chair of INTA’s Designs Committee and Vice President of FICPI’s U.S. Section. For the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, he currently serves as Liaison to FICPI. He also serves as a member of the Industrial Designs working group of the AIPLA Special Committee on Legislation. Mr. Katz is a former Chair of the Industrial Design Section for both FICPI and AIPLA, and also a member of IDSA and IPO.

PRESENTED BY:

Strafford
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Strafford on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide