[Webinar] USPTO Examiner Interview Strategies: Preparing for and Conducting Interviews to Advance Patent Prosecution

June 27th, 1:00 pm - 2:30 pm EDT
Strafford
Contact
June 27th, 2024
1:00 PM - 2:30 PM EDT

A live 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A


This CLE course will guide patent counsel on leveraging interviews with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent examiners to prosecute patents more efficiently. The panel will provide insight into conducting the interviews and offer strategies for interacting with patent examiners.

Description

Patent examiners initially reject a large percentage of patent applications. Conducting an interview with the patent examiner handling the patent application is one of the most efficient ways to advance the application. Having a dialogue with the examiner minimizes the back-and-forth between the examiner and patent counsel. Perhaps more importantly, the substance of the interview is only recorded in an Examiner Interview Summary.

Counsel must understand that the interview should not be a fishing expedition. Counsel should come in prepared, having reviewed the case, and be ready to state its argument with multiple fallback positions. The examiners generally ask for an agenda with proposed claim amendments. Interviews also provide an opportunity to understand the examiner's position on an office action.

While interviewing the patent examiner can move the patent application's prosecution forward, if patent counsel is not prepared or makes damaging admissions, it can be a disaster. Patent counsel must understand when and how to interview patent examiners to prosecute patents effectively.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys offers guidance for patent examiner interviews to advance patent prosecution. The panel will discuss the USPTO policy on interviews and provide insights to work within the system, including strategies for preparing for and interacting with examiners. The panel will offer guidance for conducting and leveraging examiner interviews.

Outline

  1. USPTO policy on interviews
    1. First action interview program
  2. Why you should conduct interviews
  3. Understanding the USPTO system and adapting the interview to accommodate that system
  4. Best practices for conducting and concluding examiner interviews
    1. Preparation
    2. Agenda
    3. Presenting amended claims

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What should counsel include in an interview agenda, and what should be avoided?
  • How can patent counsel use an examiner interview to the client's advantage?
  • How and when should patent counsel interact with examiners for effective and efficient prosecution?

FACULTY

Burgy, Adriana

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Ms. Burgy focuses on opinion work, client counseling, patent prosecution and management, and litigation in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology arts. She counsels her clients on a diverse range of patent issues. She assists clients on single-patent issues as well as complex matters involving multiple patents and applications requiring ongoing advice on patent portfolio strategy and development, with an eye towards litigation. From a patent prosecution perspective, she has drafted and prosecuted numerous patent applications domestically and internationally, guided and advised clients on complex procedural and legal issues surrounding clients' patent portfolios, developed and implemented strategic prosecution in support of ongoing litigation, generated strategies for maximizing investment in patent portfolios, and facilitated the identification of high-priority applications within patent portfolios.

Sweet, Mark

Mark D. Sweet
Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Sweet focuses his practice on portfolio analysis; due diligence investigations; interference proceedings; reissue and reexamination proceedings; preparing patentability, validity and infringement opinions; and client counseling. He is a registered patent attorney with extensive experience handling procurement matters before the USPTO, including patent application drafting and prosecution, conducting examiner interviews, filing appeals to and presenting oral arguments before the PTAB, interference proceedings, reissue proceedings, and reexamination proceedings. Mr. Sweet also has significant experience in inter partes review and post grant review proceedings. His technical expertise is diverse and includes working with technologies involving pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemicals, polymers, industrial coatings and films, and clean energy and renewable resources. Mr. Sweet served as a primary examiner at the USPTO, where he handled polymer-based technologies.

PRESENTED BY:

Strafford
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Strafford on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide