Were The SEC’s Pay Ratio Rule Efforts Valiant?

Allen Matkins
Contact

James D.C. Barrall recently published a listing of ten consensuses on CEO pay ratio planning.  He begins with the following:

“More than seven years after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the CEO pay ratio rule is finally set to require approximately 3,500 U.S. companies to disclose their 2017 ratios of their CEOs’ pay to that of their median employees in their 2018 proxy statements.

Capping the SEC’s valiant efforts in its 2013 proposed and 2015 final rule to make a poor statute workable and relatively cost effective, on September 21 the SEC and its staff issued three pieces of very helpful interpretive guidance . . . .”

I’m not willing to concede that the SEC’s efforts were “valiant”.  Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act directed the SEC to adopt the pay ratio rule.  In adopting the rule, the SEC was simply doing its job.  It was a difficult chore, but there was nothing brave or courageous about it.  (Derived from the Latin verb, valere, “valiant” means to be brave or intrepid.

Some may wonder if “consensuses” is the proper plural form of “consensus”.  It is.  The reason is that it is derived from a Fourth Declension Latin noun.  See The Latin Lawyer – How To Write Like Cicero!

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Allen Matkins

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide