What qualifies as acceptable Use in U.S. Commerce?

Ladas & Parry LLP
Contact

Ladas & Parry LLP

The mark must be used “in Commerce” and in good faith in the ordinary course of trade. While the USPTO will generally not conduct an inquiry, the applicant must claim use that qualifies as “Use in U.S. Commerce”.  What qualifies as acceptable Use in Commerce is explained below:

Where to Use

The mark must be used in commerce that may be lawfully regulated by U.S. Congress.  Typically, such use is either (a) between the United States and another country or (b) in a U.S. territory (e.g. Puerto Rico) or (c) interstate. Commerce merely within one state (intrastate) or purely outside of the United States is not sufficient, unless it directly affects commerce in other states.

  • Example 1:A restaurant having only customers in its home state is not acting “in commerce.” However, advertising the restaurant under the mark outside of the state, including via the internet, and providing the services to out-of-state customers may qualify as use in U.S. commerce.
  • Example 2:Use of a mark advertising goods or services within the United States may not qualify as “use in commerce”, if the goods or services are available outside the United States only. Even an offer to ship into the United States may not by itself suffice. However, actual shipment into the United States may suffice.

Amount of Use

  1. More than token use: The use of the mark must be in good faith in the ordinary course of trade, and must not be a “token use” made merely to reserve a right in the mark.
  2. Amount of use: Commercial transactions that are too sporadic, casual, or nominal, may not qualify as sales “in the ordinary course of trade.” Factors to consider are: (1) the amount of use; (2) the nature or quality of the transaction; and (3) what is typical use within a particular industry.
    • Example 1:An industry that sells expensive or seasonal products may make infrequent sales that are still sufficient for purposes of claiming use in U.S. Commerce.
    • Example 2:A pharmaceutical company that ships a drug bearing its trademark to clinical investigators during the Federal approval process is considered to have used the mark in U.S. Commerce.

Use Specimens

Use Specimens: Use specimens show the manner in which the mark is used (i.e. how it is seen by the consumers).  Thus, the specimen must show the mark the way it is actually used in commerce. At least one specimen is required for each class.

  • A proper use specimen for goods (Classes 1 – 34) must show the mark affixed on the outside of the goods or packaging (typically a label or tag) or on a point of sale display associated with the goods and the goods must be sold or transported in commerce.
  • A proper use specimen for services (Classes 35 – 45) must show the mark as actually used in the sale or advertising of the services recited in the application or in the course of providing the services.

Consumers need to view a mark as a source indicator (ie, brand).  Specimens where the mark is buried in prose or otherwise displayed in a way that would not suggest the function as a source indicator (eg., as mere ornamentation) are rarely if ever sufficient.

  Goods Services
Acceptable
  • On the goods
  • On labels /tags
  • On packaging, bags, boxes
  • Prominently on a user manual
  • On a point of sale display (eg., an in-store display where the goods are available for purchase)
  • Printed or online catalogue only if it shows an image of the goods and including a means (eg., an online shopping cart or a telephone number) and invitation to place an order (eg, “Call now”)
  • On an advertisement
  • On a brochure
  • On a website
  • On letterhead or business cards
  • On invoices

All of the above only if they specifically reference the service and in doing so, create an association between the mark and service

Unacceptable
  • The mark by itself
  • On a printer’s proof, mock-up, or artist’s rendering
  • On an invoice
  • On an advertisements or brochure
  • On a display where the goods are not actually available for purchase (eg., images at trade shows)
  • The mark by itself
  • Any of the acceptable examples set forth above, if they lack a reference to the service or an association between the mark and the service

Examples of acceptable and unacceptable use specimens for goods and services follow in the sections below.

Examples of Acceptable Use Specimens for Goods

  • Mark shown on the goods
  • Mark shown on tags/labels
  • Mark shown on bags/boxes/packaging
  • Mark on a point of sale (POS) display
  • Mark shown in a printed catalog with a means and invitation to place an order
  • Mark shown in an online catalog or store with a means and invitation to place an order

Examples of Acceptable Use Specimens for Services

  • Mark shown on advertisement referencing the services
  • Mark shown on brochure referencing the services
  • Mark shown on website referencing the services
  • Mark shown on invoice referencing the services
  • Mark shown on letterhead referencing the services
  • Mark shown on business card referencing the services

Examples of UNACCEPTABLE Use Specimens for Goods

  • Mark shown on an invoice
  • Mark shown on advertisements, brochures, or marketing materials
  • Mark shown on printer’s proofs (typically showing crop marks)
  • Mark shown by itself
  • Mark buried in text on product inserts
  • Mark shown in a trade show or conference where goods were not sold

Examples of UNACCEPTABLE Use Specimens for Services

  • Mark shown on advertisement NOT referencing the services
  • Mark shown on brochure NOT referencing the services
  • Mark shown on website NOT referencing the services
  • Mark shown on invoice NOT referencing the services
  • Mark shown on letterhead or business card NOT referencing the services
  • Mark shown by itself

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Ladas & Parry LLP

Written by:

Ladas & Parry LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Ladas & Parry LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide